šļø NRC 101: How U.S. Nuclear Regulation Really Works
From rule making to reactor licensing, hereās how the NRC, DOE, and Agreement States shape Americaās nuclear future.
š Cornerstone Post
š ~14ā16 min read
TL;DR
The NRC regulates nuclear licensing, safety, and oversight, but its rulemaking and licensing processes are slow and resource-intensive.
NRC is funded largely through applicant fees for licensing and renewal reviewsācreating tension between neutrality and deference to paying applicants.
Licensing new reactors typically takes 5ā7 years of NRC review on top of developer preparation, with full project timelines often stretching a decade or more.
The DOE promotes and funds nuclear innovation; the NRC regulates. Agreement States share regulatory authority for radioactive materials.
Trump-era Executive Orders attempted to accelerate or reshape the regulatory process, with mixed effects.
What the NRC Does
The NRC is an independent federal regulator. Its mission:
License nuclear power plants, fuel cycle facilities, and waste storage sites.
Enforce nuclear safety, security, and environmental protection.
Develop rules (Title 10 CFR) and adjudicate disputes.
Provide oversight through inspections, reporting, and enforcement actions.
It is not an operator and does not promote nuclearāthatās DOEās lane. NRC is designed to be conservative and deliberative.
NRC vs. DOE: Different Mandates
DOE: Research, development, demonstration; national labs; nuclear weapons; waste policy under the NWPA; and funding advanced reactor programs.
NRC: Independent regulation and licensing of civilian nuclear materials and facilities.
š DOE promotes; NRC regulates. This split keeps the regulator neutral, but also creates friction: DOE can fund advanced designs years before NRC has a rulebook for them.
Agreement States
39 states have signed agreements with the NRC to regulate byproduct, source, and certain special nuclear materials within their borders.
Agreement States oversee radioactive materials in medicine, industry, and research.
NRC retains control of reactors, interstate transport, high-level waste, and nuclear security.
This shared model decentralizes oversight but introduces variation in capacity and enforcement culture.
How a Rule Is Born
Petition or Initiation ā Filed by anyone or generated internally.
Proposed Rulemaking ā Draft rule published in the Federal Register.
Public Comment ā Stakeholders weigh in; staff must respond to substantive comments.
Final Rule ā Revised, voted by the Commission, and codified.
š Duration: 3ā10 years, depending on scope and controversy.
Hearings & Dockets
Licensing is often contested:
ASLBPs adjudicate license challenges.
Intervenors (states, NGOs, citizens) can raise safety or environmental objections.
This process ensures public participation but can delay projects significantly.
Funding Model: Who Pays?
Here is the under-discussed feature: the NRC is primarily funded through licensee and applicant fees.
90%+ of NRCās budget comes from fees charged to license applicants, reactor operators, and material licensees.
New reactor applications: Developers pay the full cost of NRC review, often hundreds of millions of dollars.
License renewals: Existing operators pay for the staff hours spent on review.
š This model means the NRCās workload is directly linked to paying applicants. Critics argue this tilts NRC toward deferenceāwhen the applicant pays the bills, staff may feel subtle pressure to enable rather than reject. Proponents argue it ensures taxpayers donāt subsidize private industry.
How Long Does It Take?
Licensing a new reactor is not quick:
Application Preparation: 3ā5 years for the applicant to develop a complete docket.
NRC Review: Typically 5ā7 years, including multiple ārequests for additional informationā (RAIs).
Combined License (COL): Vogtleās COL approval took about 6 years. New designs like SMRs are expected to take similar or longer.
Construction & Operation: After approval, building and testing can add another 5ā10 years.
š From concept to operation, a new reactor in the U.S. often spans a decade or more, even before considering financing and supply chain delays.
Trump-Era Executive Orders
The Trump administration attempted to speed up regulation via executive fiat:
EO 13771 (ā2-for-1ā rule): For every new regulation, two had to be eliminatedāunrealistic in a safety-first agency.
EO 13924 (Regulatory Relief during COVID): Encouraged flexibility in enforcement.
EOs 13891/13892: Required public access to guidance and restricted enforcement based on unpublished guidance.
š These orders increased administrative burden and slowed substantive technical work, while pushing NRC toward transparency reforms. Some were rescinded under Biden, but process changes linger.
Policy vs. Engineering
Engineering advances (e.g., SMRs, advanced fuels) outpace NRC rulemaking.
DOE funds prototypes; NRC cautiously builds regulatory frameworks (Part 53 still in draft years later).
NRCās fee-for-service funding and deliberate processes magnify delays.
Why NRC 101 Matters
Industry: Anticipate review timelines and costs.
Policy: Recognize how statutory deadlines get swallowed by NRCās processes.
Public: See why nuclear debates feel endlessāthe rules were built to move slowly.
What to Watch Next
āļø NRCās rollout of Part 53 for advanced reactors.
šļø Congressional debates on NRC funding and independence.
š Progress (or stall) in licensing SMRs and microreactors.
š Agreement State capacity in regulating radioactive materials.
š° Long-term impact of rescinded Trump-era EOs on NRC culture.
Closing Thought
The NRC was designed for safety through deliberation. But in a world of climate urgency, its funding model, slow timelines, and political crosswinds create mounting tension. When the applicant pays, when rules take a decade to move, and when DOEās push for innovation collides with NRCās conservatism, the question becomes: can the U.S. deploy nuclear fast enough to matter?
š Next in the series: [SMRs: Hype vs. Hard Edges]
š© Subscribe Free to get cornerstone posts in your inbox.
š Upgrade to Paid for the companion NIC Scorecard on NRCās regulatory process.